Fishing Circumstances on the Danube in Serbia - 10

 

 

References

 

Arce-Ibarra, A. M. and A. Charles (2008). Non-management of Natural Resources: The Case of Inland Fisheries in the Mayan Zone, Quintana Roo, México. Human Ecology, Volume 36, Number 6, 853-860, DOI: 10.1007/s10745-008-9201-6.

Branch, T. A., Jensen, O. P., Ricard, D., Ye, Y. and R. Hilborn (2011). Contrasting Global Trends in Marine Fishery Status Obtained from Catches and from Stock Assessments. Conservation Biology, Volume 25, No. 4, 777–786. DOI: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2011.01687.x.

Fisheries, Fresh-Water – dam, river, sea, freshwater, effects, important, largest, system, plan. http://www.waterencyclopedia.com/En-Ge/Fisheries-Fresh-Water.html

Johannes, R. E., Freeman, M. M. R. and R. J. Hamilton, (2000). Ignore fishers' knowledge and miss the boat. Fish and Fisheries, 1, 257–271.

Haapasaari, P., Michielsens, C. G. J., Karjalainen, T. P., Reinikainen, K. and S. Kuikka (2007). Management measures and fishers' commitment to sustainable exploitation: a case study of Atlantic salmon fisheries in the Baltic Sea. ICES Journal of Marine Science Advance Access, published February 13, 2007, 1-9.

Hernes, H-K., Jentoft, S. and K. Mikalsen (2005). Fisheries Governance, Social Justice and Participatory Decision-Making. Participation in Fisheries Governance. Reviews: Methods and Technologies in Fish Biology and Fisheries. Volume 4, 103-118. DOI: 10.1007/1-4020-3778-3_6.

Kottelat, M. and J. Freyhof (2007). Handbook of European Freshwater Fishes. Kottelat, Cornol, Switzerland and Freyhof, Berlin, Germany.

Lenhardt, M., Hegediš, A., Cvejić, S., Cvijanović, G. and M. Smederevac (2006). Diversity and Status of Fish Stock in Special Reserve of Nature ''Gornje Podunavlje''. Ecologica, 13 (12), 21 - 25.

Niesar, M., Arlinghaus, R., Rennert B. and T. Mehner (2004). Coupling insights from a carp, Cyprinus carpio, angler survey with feeding experiments to evaluate, composition, quality and phosphorus input of groundbait in coarse fishing. Fisheries Management and Ecology, 11, 225–235.

Sekhar, N. U. (2007). Social Capital and Fisheries Management: The Case of Chilika Lake in India. Environmental Management, 39, 497-505. DOI 10.1007/s00267-006-0183-0.

Silvano, R. A. M. and J. Valbo-Jørgensen (2008). Beyond fishermen's tales: Contributions of fishers' local ecological knowledge to fish ecology and fisheries management. Environ Dev Sustain. June 2007. DOI 10.1007/s10668-008-9149-0.

Simonović, P. (2005). Sustainable development and fish stocks. Textbook on Environment and sustainable development. Environmental management Module. Centre of Multidisciplinary Studies, Belgrade.

Simonović, P. (2010). Uvod u ihtiologiju. Biološki fakultet, Univerzitet u Beogradu. Beograd.

Smederevac-Lalić, M., Pešić, R., Cvejić, S. and P. Simonović (2011). Socio-economic features of commercial fishery in the bordering upper Danube River area of Serbia. Environ Monit Assess. 2011 Jun 15. Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011. DOI 10.1007/s10661-011-2140-5

Valbo-Jørgensen, J. and F.A. Poulsen (2000). Using local knowledge as a research tool in the study of river fish biology: Experiences from the Mekong. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 2, 253–276.


Results and Discussion
Through analysis of statistical data taken from the Statistical Office of the Republic of Serbia from the period beginning in 1951, when the first catch data on freshwater fish species was recorded, until 2011, many changes in the organization and collection of data were observed. According to fish catch data statistics in Serbia recorded between 1951 and 2011, the number of reporting units has been changed many times. From 1956 until 1996 the number of reporting units in Serbia has decreased: there were 77 units in 1956, 35 in 1961, 33 in 1969 and 7 units in 1996 who reported annual catch numbers to the Statistical Office of the Republic of Serbia. In 2003, only three reporting units remained. Statistical methods used were changing till the year 2005, when electronic data archiving was introduced.
In the period between 1951 and 2010 the list of fish species collected and presented in statistical reports has been changed several times, which indicates that the composition of the ichthyofauna has changed and/or is changing the structure and abundance of certain species of fish or their importance on the market.
Until 1968 the Statistical Office collected catch data for species recorded in rivers, channels, and lakes by both recreational and commercial fishermen together. Species listed in the landing books made by each reporting unit were: Acipenseridae together (sterlet (Acipenser ruthenus), Russian sturgeon (Acipenser gueldenstaedtii), beluga (Huso huso)); pikeperch (Sander lucioperca); European catfish (Silurus glanis); carp (Cyprinus carpio); pike (Esox lucius); tench (Tinca tinca); secondary economically important fish; bleak (Alburnus alburnus); European eel (Anguilla anguilla); Black sea shad (Alosa immaculata) and other.
From 1969 recorded catch particularly from the Danube shows that species listed in catch were: Russian sturgeon; stellate sturgeon (Acipenser stellatus); beluga; sterlet; carp; Prussian carp (Carassius gibelio); grasscarp (Ctenopharyngodon idella); silver carp (Hypophthalmichthys molitrix); bighead carp (Hypophthalmichthys nobilis); bream (Abramis brama); pikeperch; pike; European catfish; asp (Aspius aspius); ide (Leuciscus idus); zobel (Ballerus sapa); tench.
From 1977, three non-native fish species (Prussian carp, silver carp and bighead carp) became economically important for fisheries in Serbia.